Extensive research has gone into the study of dogs because of how close
we as humans are to them. They are our pets, family members, and
friends. Recent research however, has suggested a very bold and
interesting idea that dogs actually have a moral code. This come from
the work of Marc Bekoff who is a Cognitive ethologist and professor at
the University of Colorado in Boulder. He has been studying dogs for
many years and is keen about understanding how dogs communicate with
each other through play. For example, when looking at dogs at a dog
park, some dogs will display what is known as a "play bow", which is
used as an instigation, clarification, warning, and an apology. Dogs
will often do this before lunging at another dog or nipping at them as
if to say "I am just trying to play with you not hurt you" or " I didn't
mean to push you over, I am sorry". These actions seem to suggest some
sort of moral code while playing. To test this, Bekoff has analyzed
years of videotaped data of animals playing to look for certain body
language and cues that dogs give each other to send them a message as
well as maintain tight social bonds. He found that canines
"role-reverse" or "self-handicap" during play, which is when a larger
dog will role on their back so that a smaller dog will have an advantage
and the larger one will not jump on the smaller one as many times as the
smaller one jumps on the larger one. He noticed that certain "rules"
are maintained and must be followed and a dog will signal another dog if
these rules are broken or are not being followed. These signals can
range from a small eye squint to a certain dog or certain group members
not engaging in acts of play when one member is being too rough. Another example is that dogs will often not begin to play with another dog until
they have their attention by running into their field of view or tugging
on their ear suggesting that dogs know when they are not being paid
attention to. Bekoff's work has suggested a much deeper intuition and
moral standing than previously thought, although I am sure most if not
all dog owners knew there dog had this ability by now.
References
Bekoff, M 1995, 'Play signals as punctuation, The structure of social
play in canids', Behaviour, vol. 132, pp. 419-429.
Such a sweet video! I do find it fascinating that dogs do seem to “play by the rules” as it were. How much of this moral code to we, as humans, pick up on? Can you suggest a possible way that this moral code might have evolved? Very interesting!
I honestly think that this moral code developed both through convergent evolution with humans, we would intervene when two dogs got in a fight and scold the one who had triggered it, as well as it being something passed on from when dogs were more closely related to wolves. Wolves also act in this same manner, they take care of the younger ones in the pack and make sure everyone is "behaving" within the family. I think as humans it is very hard to tell how much we pick up on because we can often anthropomorphize and misjudge what dogs are trying to communicate. If we were to study how dogs communicate to each other than I believe we could very easily pick up on this moral code because it seems to be a very common "language" between all dogs.
What an interesting idea. How widely accepted is it? When studying behaviour, how do you guard against anthropomorphising behaviour that might have a completely different meaning altogether? Do you think Bekoff's analysis overcomes those kinds of problems?
I think this idea is very widely accepted by dog owners. but perhaps not by scientists. To guard against anthropomorphising behaviour that might have a completely different meaning than its origin you must really study the behavior and rule out any other possible reasons for it being shown. However you still may never know why an animal behaves in a certain way. I think Bekoff's analysis overcomes some of these kinds of problems, he has been studying dog behavior for years however I think he still has a lot of unanswered questions to work on and a lot of behaviors to explain.
Such a sweet video! I do find it fascinating that dogs do seem to “play by the rules” as it were. How much of this moral code to we, as humans, pick up on? Can you suggest a possible way that this moral code might have evolved? Very interesting!
ReplyDeleteI honestly think that this moral code developed both through convergent evolution with humans, we would intervene when two dogs got in a fight and scold the one who had triggered it, as well as it being something passed on from when dogs were more closely related to wolves. Wolves also act in this same manner, they take care of the younger ones in the pack and make sure everyone is "behaving" within the family. I think as humans it is very hard to tell how much we pick up on because we can often anthropomorphize and misjudge what dogs are trying to communicate. If we were to study how dogs communicate to each other than I believe we could very easily pick up on this moral code because it seems to be a very common "language" between all dogs.
DeleteWhat an interesting idea. How widely accepted is it? When studying behaviour, how do you guard against anthropomorphising behaviour that might have a completely different meaning altogether? Do you think Bekoff's analysis overcomes those kinds of problems?
ReplyDeleteI think this idea is very widely accepted by dog owners. but perhaps not by scientists. To guard against anthropomorphising behaviour that might have a completely different meaning than its origin you must really study the behavior and rule out any other possible reasons for it being shown. However you still may never know why an animal behaves in a certain way. I think Bekoff's analysis overcomes some of these kinds of problems, he has been studying dog behavior for years however I think he still has a lot of unanswered questions to work on and a lot of behaviors to explain.
ReplyDelete