This cute little creature has been shown to not only have socially monogamous pairs, but also genetically monogamous ones. To test this, researchers (Huck et al. 2014) collected samples from 128 individual monkeys living in 29 groups or as solitary individuals. They collaborated behavioral field observations with genetic samples from 35 infants born to 17 reproducing pairs and found that every infant was indeed the offspring of the reproducing pair. There was no evidence of extra-pair paternity. This is most likely due to the high level of involvement males have in the caring for their young. They play with them, feed them, and carry them on their backs. Without the high level of commitment from these proud papas, the intense faithfulness these guys show would not make sense (at least in the animal world). It even surprised the researchers by how faithful these small primates are and it seems to give them hope that monogamy (even in the animal world) may be useful and sometimes even preferred.
References
Huck, M., Fernandez-Duque, E., Babb, P. and Schurr, T. 2014. Correlates of genetic monogamy in socially monogamous mammals: insights from Azara's owl monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1782).

Owl monkeys are awesome! You mention that this species most likely shows monogamy due to the high level of commitment shown by fathers. Yet, there are numerous other primate species (such as tamarins and marmosets) where the fathers contribute to offspring care, yet pairs are not necessarily genetically monogamous. Do you think this is related to the social system – owl monkeys occurring only in monogamous pairs (maybe due to small population size) and marmosets occurring in social groups (facilitating higher opportunity for extra-pair copulations)? Either way, paternal care in itself is rare in the animal kingdom (only 5-10% of species), so this is very cool!
ReplyDeleteHello Tasmin! Yes I do believe that their social structure plays a role. Because they live in primarily just pairs and have fewer group numbers there would be less access to other mates and therefore other opportunities for extra-pair copulations. In the article it also described how the males would protect their females very intensely if another male tried to mate with her. This would sometimes lead to the original male dying and then the new male would become the females new mate. However, the researchers did a separate study and found that the more mates a female had, often the less babies she had in her lifetime and the shorter she lived. I would presume this was because of stress levels and not being able to live with a stable mate. It was definitely and interesting article!
ReplyDelete